Israel in Prophecy


The apostle Paul used the illustration of an olive tree to point to the fact that we (Gentiles who are converted) are grafted into the stock of Israel:

Romans 11
24 For if you were cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and were grafted contrary to nature into a good olive tree: how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree?

That olive tree is Jesus Christ. This is made plain in Galatians:

Galatians 3
28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

There are not 2 trees! There is not one tree for the nation of Israel, and another for the church. It is one tree; it is the election of grace; it is the Isaac-seed, not the Ishmael seed. Abraham is our father too, and we are heirs with him.

Galatians 3
29 And if you be Christ’s, then are you Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

The current physical nation of Israel are Ishmaelites, children of unbelief:

Galatians 4
24 Which things are an allegory: for these are the two covenants; the one from the mount Sinai, which genders to bondage, which is Hagar.
25 For this Hagar is mount Sinai in Arabia, and answers to Jerusalem which now is, and is in bondage with her children.

Hagar was the servant of Sarah, Abraham’s wife. She produced a son for Abraham called Ishmael. Ishmael represented Abraham’s attempt to fulfill God’s promise by his own efforts. The apostle likened the earthly Jerusalem to Hagar, because they were trying to please God by their fleshly efforts, without the working of God’s Spirit. Therefore, if Jerusalem was Hagar, then her children were Ishmaelites.

Ishmael, although given an earthly blessing, did not inherit the spiritual promises given to Abraham. And so Ishmaelites today will not inherit those promises either. The reason is simple: an Ishmaelite is a “child of the flesh”. He represents the attempt of the flesh to do what God has promised, without the cleansing of sin and the new life of the Spirit. Since God cannot bless sin with immortality, Ishmael cannot receive the blessings.

So only those Ishmaelites who come to faith will be joined back into the tree of Christ. At the moment they are converted, they cease to become Ishmaelites, and become Israelites, because they receive the forgiveness of sins, and the new life in the place of the old.

If these converts are from carnal Jewish stock, then they become “grafted back into their own olive tree” (Romans 11:24). This tree is not their fleshly lineage. It is the lineage of faith.

There is an “everlasting gospel” (Revelation 14:6) and God’s plan has always been the same, even though at times He used different vessels to illustrate it. The “promised land” in it’s fullness was never only a small spot on this old earth, it encompassed the whole new earth. Abraham looked for a city whose builder and maker was God.

When David sat on the throne, and there was rest from the enemies of Israel, the Lord said:

2 Samuel 7
10 Moreover I will appoint a place for my people Israel, and will plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their own, and move no more; neither shall the children of wickedness afflict them any more, as beforetime.

They were in the land, yet God said “I will appoint a place for my people…and will plant them…in a place of their own.” This can only mean that the land of Canaan, upon this old sin-cursed earth, was not the land God intended for them. It was only a picture, a type of the real, a training ground.

Jesus was the king promised to Israel, the one who would assume rulership.

Genesis 49
10 The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.

On the basis of this, and similar prophecies (Ezekiel 21:26,27), the people of Jesus’ time expected him to take the throne and put down the Roman power. They were completely mistaken, because they did not understand the spiritual nature of the work and kingdom that God intended. This misunderstanding is still with us today and manifests itself in such systems as dispensationalism.

A correct understanding of prophecy goes hand-in-hand with a correct understanding of the gospel. When the times of crisis come (and they are already to some degree upon us) we need to know what the Lord’s will is, and what position to occupy. It will be as fatal in our day to misunderstand these things as it was for the Jews in Christ’s day.

The idea that God will somehow miraculously convert all the physical Jews to be His chosen people again, when the life and death of Christ could not convince them, is against all reason. Does God have a better thing to offer than His own Son?!

This attention on carnal Israel is a distraction and will only lead to further wars and strife in the middle East, which will only plunge the world into deeper trouble. This is what Satan wants: to drive the world to desperation so that he can push his solution to the world problems.

The real Israelites in our day will be those who overcome every defect, and perfect Christian character in a time of deep trial and apostasy. Israel means “overcomer.” The battle is against sin and unbelief, not against Muslim nations. Study the life of Christ more closely: the final struggle will be similar to that which happened when He was among us. The last generation will “follow the Lamb wherever He goes” (Revelation 14:4).

The Jewish people in Christ’s day had some very unrealistic expectations and interpretations of prophecy which would have involved God transgressing His own law in order to bless them. They wanted God’s power to support their plans and ideas.

That’s what Satan wanted to do in heaven: usurp God’s authority (Isaiah 14:13). And the Jewish leaders, whom Jesus called the “children of the devil” (John 8:44), wanted to do the same thing. They would have supported Christ if He would have used His miraculous powers to put down the Roman armies.

But they were unwilling to truly come into harmony with His law and put away their own pride and selfishness. Therefore Jesus finally had to say:

Matthew 21
43 The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.

Jesus also clearly stated,

John 18
36 If my kingdom was of this world, my servants would fight.

Christ’s servants never fight with carnal weapons! That’s not how the kingdom of God is established. All who use such weapons are not his “servants,” nor are they building his “kingdom.”

God’s promises involving men are always conditional. Sometimes you have to search for the condition in similar verses or statements, but it is always there. For example, the condition upon which Abraham received the promise is stated in Genesis 18:19. The condition of Israel always being God’s people (Jeremiah 31:35) is stated in the previous verses (vs 31-34).

God’s kingdom is a righteous kingdom, established upon a righteous law. This is the picture given in the sanctuary where the throne of God rested upon the tables of the law (God’s presence was over the mercy seat, and under this was the law). Those whose hearts and lives are in harmony with that law are His people and will enter into the New Jerusalem and inherit the New Earth.

The nation of Israel was unique in that it was a separate kingdom on earth, with land and a government directly under God (at least for a time). It had a special opportunity to be a missionary station to the whole world. God stated this in many verses: His house was to be a house of prayer for all people (Isaiah 56:7); all nations were to admire the laws of Israel and how close their God was to them (Deuteronomy 4:5-10) and by implication desire to join them as did Rahab and Ruth, etc.

This opportunity, which could no longer be fulfilled through a literal nation, passed on to the church, which are called “a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation” (1 Peter 2:9). They are now to bring that same gospel and law to all the nations, “then shall the end come” (Matthew 24:14).

You can also see that parallel in comparing Isaiah 60 with Revelation 18:1. That which was promised to literal Israel (filling the world with the light of the knowledge of God) is fulfilled through spiritual Israel.

This Revelation 18 angel is part of the series of angels in Revelation 14. Six are mentioned in Revelation 14:6-20, and this one in Revelation 18 fits in between the third and fourth of Revelation 14. This must be so, for the message is similar, and there are patterns of seven all through the book).

But the Revelation 14 series of angels starts with the proclamation of the “everlasting gospel.” Since this work of proclaiming the gospel has been given to the church, we may safely assume that the Revelation 18 angel is also part of the church. Therefore, the work of the church in presenting the gospel goes right up until the coming of Christ.

Jesus clearly stated that His kingdom was “not of this world, else His servants would fight.” In His Sermon on the Mount, He repeated an earlier scripture from the Psalms that “the meek will inherit the earth.”

It will not be until He comes again that the “kingdoms of this world” will become His (Revelation 11:15), but the latter chapters of Revelation make it clear that the earth is in ruins at that time. His coming will usher in the resurrection (1 Thessalonians 4:16), where the saints will rise from their graves to reign with him (Revelation 20:6).

But since the renovation of the earth does not take place until after the 1000 years, the saints will not rule on this earth. Corruption and incorruption do not go together (1 Corinthians 15:50). Instead the saints go to heaven, to the New Jerusalem, wherein is the garden of Eden and tree of life that was taken from this earth before the flood (John 14:1-3, Revelation 22:2,3, Revelation 2:7). This is the city of God, which at the end of the 1000 years comes down from heaven (Revelation 20:7-9).

One of the tasks that the saints will be involved in is judging (Revelation 20:4, 1 Corinthians 6:3). This indicates that we will study the history of transgression, just like we study the Bible now, only the records in heaven include every word and thought of every person that ever lived. It will be a massive library, and we will be able to trace God’s work throughout all history and in all lives. Do you enjoy studying the Bible now? Then you will be thrilled beyond belief in the library of the New Jerusalem!

The Old Testament prophecies to literal Israel will be fulfilled to spiritual Israel in an even more glorious way, because the glory of the New Covenant far exceeds the glory of the Old.

Were they promised land? It will be fulfilled, not just in a small section called Palestine, but in the giving of the whole earth made new!

Were they promised a king? It will be fulfilled, not just with a sinful man who passes away, but with an immortal king called Jesus, and all His saints with Him!

Were they promised rest from their enemies? It will be fulfilled, not just with a temporal truce or peace treaty, but with an everlasting rest in a kingdom full of sinless souls who would not even think of wielding a weapon to destroy another!

I truly do not understand why anyone would trade these rich fulfilments for a few earthly crumbs…unless they only want the outward gifts of God, and not His character.



2 thoughts on “Israel in Prophecy”

  1. I have to say that my wife and I have been blessed by the music in the early Advent hymns and your site is done so well.

    I do have some concern though. As I have been looking around on the site I come across the name Robert Brinsmead. As far as I know he has not done the SDA church well. I know people that left the truth specifically because of his teachings. Then as I looked him up on Google his name is tied to Desmond Ford. This is a big concern. Maybe I am not understanding what direction you are coming from but this is a bit confusing.

    Other than that you have made a very beautiful site. Thank you.

    1. Bill,
      Thanks for the kind comments. The name of Robert Brinsmead is indeed controversial, but his life went through various phases.

      My interest in his work is only in the early phase, which was roughly from 1959 to 1967. At that time he was involved in what was to be called “The Awakening” message, which was essentially a revival of the gospel of Waggoner and Jones, along with an emphasis on the core Adventist doctrines of the Judgment, Cleansing of the Sanctuary, Latter Rain, and so forth.

      It was fundamental Adventism combined with the 1888 gospel message. At that time, it was still controversial because Adventist leaders were courting the favor of evangelical Protestantism, which was not in harmony with the 1888 message. Robert Brinsmead’s emphasis on character perfection as a preparation for the judgment of the living and Christ’s identification in his flesh with fallen humanity, put him at odds with this new evangelical Adventism. Because of this, his membership credentials were revoked. But I believe this was a mistake, and that most of what he taught in those early years (minus a few small errors) was correct.

      You can read my article “Criticizing a Messenger” to get an idea of the history of those times.

      Also, one of Robert’s articles from that early ministry is available here: “The Scope of Revelation” which is a very enlightening summary of the book of Revelation, from an Adventist viewpoint.

      There is also one book from him on this site: “The Vision by the Hiddekel” which I believe to be the best Adventist exposition of Daniel 11.

      As well, there is one audio recording where Bob outlines the early history of his life, from his birth to the Awakening message: “Robert Brinsmead: Life Story to 1963“. The sound quality is poor, but the message is good.

      In those early days, Bob’s message was not at all in harmony with Desmond Ford. It was actually strongly opposed to it. But somewhere around 1970, Bob switched his theology drastically towards a radical Protestant view of “legal justification”. This was very different from his “Awakening years.” And it was in this time that he was associated with Desmond Ford. I don’t sympathize with those views. You can read about his history on Wikipedia: “Robert Brinsmead“.

      The fact that Brinsmead later went down other paths does not stop me from appreciating the truth he had in the 1960’s, which is why I freely use the material from those times, as well as some of their songs. Some people may not agree with this practice, but I believe that it is truth that is important, and not the vessel God uses. We should not refuse truth because the vessel was weak or later fell into error.

      You might not be aware of this, but many of the key figures in the Millerite movement and leading into the early SDA period, such as Samuel Snow, Josiah Litch, and O.R.L. Crosier also departed from the faith and went into error, but we still cherish the truths they brought when God was using them. God uses weak human vessels, but let this not be a stumbling block to us.

Comments are closed.